Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Truth on the MarketPatent Thickets: Lessons from the Sewing Machine War
My colleague Adam Mossoff’s wonderful paper, A Stitch in Time: The Rise and Fall of the Sewing Machine Patent Thicket, was featured in a WSJ article focused on drawing implications for the smartphone market by studying our experience with the sewing machine patent pool. Professor Mossoff is optimistic about the opportunities for players in the smartphone market to overcome any “anticommons” problem:
Mossoff takes several lessons from this historical example. First, he notes that despite the litigation, the smartphone market isn?t caught in a patent thicket yet, with production and marketing held up indefinitely as happened with the sewing machine. There are, of course, thousands of smartphones for sale, and new ones being developed.
Second, even if it gets to that point, it wouldn?t necessarily be cause for alarm. ?If our intuition says, ?The sky is falling,? we can say, ?OK, but did the sky fall in the 1850s??? Though anti-trust legislation today would likely render a smartphone patent pool an impossibility, the fact remains that lawsuits are often no more than an invitation to negotiation. ?Oftentimes the way a party signals to another party in one?s industry, ?I?m serious about this?you need to speak with me,? is by filing a lawsuit,? says Mossoff.
And most companies do reach amicable licensing agreements where they use one another?s technology for a fee. ?The average cell phone has thousands of patents owned by entities that have licenses with each other,? says Mossoff. Earlier this month, for instance, Microsoft licensed patents by Palm, Palmsource, Bell Communications Research, and Geoworks.
So while the maze of patent lawsuits might seem like wasteful litigation, Mossoff cautions that the opposite might very well be true. Those who defend the patent system and intellectual property rights argue that it encourages innovation by ensuring that inventors get their due. ?What the patent system is about is not what?s happening today or yesterday, but what?s going to happen tomorrow,? says Mossoff.
For those who would like the full length version of the paper, which is highly recommend, see here.
Filed under: business, economics, intellectual property, patent, technology
Full post as published by Truth on the Market on November 02, 2010 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

Patent Thickets, Incremental Invention, and Innovation:
Patent Thickets and Patent Trolls:
The Sewing Machine War -- The First American Patent Thicket:
The Sewing Machine Combination -- The First American Patent Pool:
Mossoff on Patent Thickets at the VC
Patent Thickets, Private Ordering, and the Sewing Machine







