Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Truth on the MarketCPI Symposium featuring Ginsburg and Wright on Antitrust Sanctions
Competition Policy International’s newest issue has been released. The issue is focused on cartel sanctions and features a colloquium on a piece co-authored by Judge Douglas Ginsburg and me on Antitrust Sanctions, with comments from a fantastic lineup of antitrust economists and lawyers: Joseph Harrington (Johns Hopkins), Pieter Kalbfleisch (Netherlands Competition Authority), Mariana Tavares de Araujo (SDE, Brazil), and Donald Klawiter (Sheppard Mullin). The comments are interesting and agree and disagree with a variety of features of the Ginsburg & Wright proposal for even further (but not completely) shifting the focus of antitrust sanctions from the corporation toward responsible individuals, and adding debarment to the cartel enforcement toolkit.
The entire issue can be downloaded here, and also features an excellent symposium on cartel sanctions.
Here is our abstract:
In this article, we first discuss traditional deterrence theory as applied to optimal criminal antitrust penalties. Then we evaluate both the U.S. and EU experience with ever-increasing corporate fines and the available empirical evidence on the deterrent value of cartel sanctions. In the next part we turn to our claim that the conventional wisdom of ever-increasing corporate fines to solve the problem of under-deterrence is misguided. The determination of the optimal sanction for price-fixing should be guided by two principles: (1) the total sanction must be great enough, but no greater than necessary, to take the profit out of price-fixing; and (2) the individuals responsible for the price-fixing should be given a sufficient disincentive to discourage them from engaging in the activity. We propose altering the distribution of criminal sanctions for corporations and the individuals who fix prices on their behalf, and introducing sanctions for negligent officers and directors consistent with our two fundamental principles. Finally, we discuss the experience with debarment as a sanction in other contexts, and how it might operate in the context of U.S. antitrust enforcement.
Filed under: antitrust, business, cartels, corporate crime, economics
Full post as published by Truth on the Market on November 09, 2010 (boomark / email).
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million
MasterCard
settles antitrust lawsuit with Amex for $1.8 billion
Visa, MasterCard
Antitrust with Discover Settled for $2.75 Billion
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
alleging freight forwarding antitrust.
Airlines Price Fixing
Antitrust Case Settled for $504 Million
Antitrust
Price Fixing Could Cost Consumers up to $300 Billion Annually

Georgetown Law Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium - 2009
Innovation in the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law
Antitrust and Innovation Symposium, Stanford Law May 20-21, 2010
Wright & Stone on Behavioral Antitrust
Prediction and Antitrust: An Invitational Symposium - June 23, 2010
Antitrust in the Energy Sector Symposium Issue








