ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> Nuts & Boalts

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Students

: Nuts & Boalts

TSA Sees London, France, Etc.

ADVERTISEMENTS
A nation-wide chorus of dissent over the TSA's exciting pornographic screening procedures has been building for a while, but this week, it seems to have reached a tipping point. That's largely thanks to this blog entry and accompanying video, which nicely illustrate the ridiculous catch-22 the TSA has created for anyone who wants to get on a plane without exposing themselves or having their genitals caressed (although, to be fair, how often do you get to do either of those things legally, in public?).

The blogger, positioning himself as the Rosa Parks of this particular civil rights crusade, opted out of the "Airplane"-inspired boob scanner and found himself subject to an even more invasive patdown that would include some touching of "his junk." When he attempted to refuse both procedures and simply leave the airport, he was threatened with a $10,000 fine and "civil suit," although this was probably just a bluff by an especially stereotypical airport security person.

My initial response to this controversy was to mock people overly concerned with it. You have to admit, there is an element of narcissism in fearing that a TSA worker who sees thousands of greyed-out faceless naked people on his computer screen every day would get it up for YOUR PRESCIOUS BODY. I was swayed, however, by the blogger's tale of misery and by findings linking the penis detectors not just to embarassment, but to cancer.

Luckily, I'm not alone. Hatred for the new TSA procedures seems to be one of those rare causes that can still unite liberals and conservatives, with anti-scanner headlines dominating both the Drudge Report and my leftist friends' facebook feeds for most of the week.

All of this has culminated in the scheduling of a national "opt-out" day for the day before Thanksgiving. Travellers are encouraged to opt-out of the scans in favor of the patdowns, which are time-consuming and will likely create costly backups at major airports on the year's busiest travel day. Travellers are also encouraged to slyly wink at their TSA agent as he approaches the aforementioned "junk," just for kicks. Whether these delays will cause more frustration for the TSA or average Americans who don't care about this issue remains to be seen. But for now, I'm in favor--if only because America could really use a win on a nonpartisan civil rights issue right now, no matter how small (no pun intended).

Full post as published by Nuts & Boalts on November 15, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/02/26 10:41:02)