ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

Executive Compensation and the Financial Crisis: A Problem In Search of a Solution (Still) (Part 2)

By J Robert Brown Jr.

ADVERTISEMENTS

We are examining whether compensation practices that were identified as a possible cause of the financial crisis have changed.       

As we noted in the last post, the Council for Institutional Investors sponsored a report on excutive compensation.  The Report (Wall Street Pay, Size, Structure and Significance for Shareowners,  Paul Hodgson, Senior Research Associate, with Greg Ruel, Advisory Services Manager, and Michelle Lamb, Research Associate, The Corporate Library, Nov. 2010), examined compensation of a number of large financial firms both before and after the financial crisis. 

Of the most significant conclusions about pre-crisis compensation concerned the amount of compensation.  As the Report noted:

  • Wall Street's median total realized compensation levels were between two and three times the levels found in the rest of the Fortune 50 during the five years from 2003–2007. The differential was driven for the most part by Wall Street's appetite for larger awards of time-restricted stock.

In addition, the large amounts were not linked to long term performance goals.  As the Report noted:

  • Little or no Wall Street compensation was linked to long-term future performance measures. This contrasts with compensation at many non-financial companies, where incentive pay was awarded for hitting long-term performance targets.

Both factors contributed to the excessive risk taking.  Again, as the Report noted:

  • In sum, the lack of long-term performance measurement on Wall Street and high absolute levels of compensation likely helped to fuel excessive risk-taking. Large amounts of compensation were delivered without restrictions and based on short-term performance. Such payouts were partly a legacy of the banks' origins as partnerships — but without the moderating element of partner-ownership. 

In short, the problems arose not only in the form of the consideration but the amount.  

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on December 15, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0034 secs (from cache 11/03/26 10:36:04)