Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportTijani v. Holder (9th Cir. - Dec. 6, 2010)
By Shaun Martin
It's a three-judge panel, and all of its members are Ninth Circuit judges. An opinion gets written, and the inevitable post-opinion petitions are filed. One judge votes to grant the petition for panel rehearing. Another judge would vote to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
But the petition for rehearing en banc is denied, with no judge requesting a vote. How does that happen?
Here's one way. Check out the panel composition, and how they vote. Pretty neat.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on December 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Regina v M(L) and Others; Regina v Tabot; Regina v Tijani WLR Daily
Photos from the Holder Hearing
Holder should reject military commissions and indefinite detention policy
"Holder Says He's Open to 'Reconfiguring' the 9th Circuit"
ERIC HOLDER HEADING UNDER THE BUS Even more ominous for Holder: Rahm Emanuel is making it clear t









