Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Excess Copyright

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

International Law

: Excess Copyright

Objections to AC's proposed Interim Tariff - December 10, 2010

By Howard Knopf, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Several objections have been filed to AC's proposed interim tariff. More may come by the end of the evening.

There is overwhelming opposition based upon factors such as:

procedural fairness
lack of jurisdiction on the part of the Board
lack of any preceding tariff
inappropriateness of imposing an interim tariff to fund AC's application
lack of any evidence filed by AC as to its financial hardship or any other issues
lack of rights and repertoire by AC and evidence showing that AC has a "minuscule" portion of necessary repertoire
contrary precedents from the Board itself
lack of any legal void if no interim tariff is imposed
how AC has brought the current situation onto itself
etc.

Here are the main documents (without the numerous attachments) filed so far (in alphabetical order):

There are a lot of important and good arguments here. Quite unlike the AC submissions, there is also a lot of evidence. If the Board does decide to impose an interim tariff, it would seem very likely that judicial review (an appeal) would be pursued and there may well be very good grounds to do so. Indeed, Access Copyright will have its work cut out for it in the next few days before it files its reply by noon on Wednesday, December 15, 2010. A reply, of course, can only deal with new issues raised in the objections today. It cannot be used to fill in any lacunae in the arguments or evidence filed earlier.

Several of the arguments confirm points I have previously made on this blog, such as AC's inability to sue anyone on its own. For many reasons, including AC's previous track record in major test cases, it would be surprising if any publishers would lend their good names and money to pursuing a Canadian post-secondary institution that is acting in good faith and choosing to do so without being tied to Access Copyright either by a voluntary agreement or a supposedly mandatory interim tariff imposed by the Board.

Indeed, AC's choices leading up to the current circumstances are mentioned by several participants. These choices might make it very difficult for a plaintiff in such potential litigation, even if the plaintiff had status to sue, to obtain an injunction. It would also be interesting to see if statutory minimum damages could be pushed down to a nominal or maybe even nil amount under the circumstances.

Hopefully, this material and recent blogs will provide useful insights for many in the post secondary community who may have felt overwhelmed and even intimidated by Access Copyright and who may now see that it is quite possible to move on without AC and without an interim tariff.

Full post as published by Excess Copyright on December 10, 2010 (boomark / email).

Lawsuits and Settlements

Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement

Expedia Class Action Settlement Proposed for $123.4 Million
Expedia Settlement Proposed for $123.4 Million

$11,250,000 Settlement Proposed in Amkor Class Action
Amkor Reaches Proposed Settlement in Securities Class Action

Settlement Proposed in Fomoco ERISA Class Action
Fomoco ERISA Class Action Proposed Settlement Reached with Ford

WaMu Mutual Stock Class Action Settlement Proposed
WaMu Mutual Stock Class Action Settlement Proposed

$7.5 Million Settlement Proposed in Gillette M3P Power Razor Class Action
$7.5 Million Settlement Proposed in Gillette M3P Power Razor Class Action

Related Searches

#1 Online Legal Resource

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

US Law Tweets

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

What is this?

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.