Legal Marketing & PR

Ohio Judges Can Tweet and Friend Lawyers Online

By Larry Bodine

In one of the most comprehensive and detailed examinations in the nation, the Supreme Court of Ohio's disciplinary board has decided that judges may use Twitter and 'friend' lawyers who appear before them.

The advisory opinion from the Board of Commissioners on Grievances & Discipline advises judges that social media use is permitted but must be done with caution, and it offers wide ranging, specific guidance to judges on how to navigate the new waters of social media without violating judicial canons that require judges to avoid even the appearance of bias or impropriety.

'This is a topic of great interest to the legal community because, like the rest of the nation, more judges are experimenting with social media in both their personal and professional lives,' said Jon Marshall, the board's secretary. 'For those judges who choose to use this technology, we hope this opinion gives them practical guidance on how to do so and maintain their obligations under the Code of Judicial Conduct.'

A recent national study found that 40 percent of judges report using social media profile sites like Facebook and LinkedIn, a proportion roughly equal to that in the general U.S. adult population. Smaller numbers reported using microblogging sites like Twitter and other less popular social media, but the numbers are expected to grow.

Opinion 2010-7 finds that a judge may be a 'friend' on a social networking site with a lawyer who appears as counsel in a case before the judge, but cautions: 'As with any other action a judge takes, a judge's participation on a social networking site must be done carefully in order to comply with the ethical rules in the Code of Judicial Conduct.'

For more, please go to the LawMarketing Portal.

Full post as published by Larry Bodine's LawMarketing Blog on December 10, 2010 (boomark / email).