Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Florida Blogs -> South Florida Lawyers
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Florida
: South Florida LawyersJustice Scalia Thinks the 14th Amendment Applies Equally To All Hetero Men.
Amanda Terkel notes a quite astonishing interview with Justice Scalia from the California Lawyer:
In 1868, when the 39th Congress was debating and ultimately proposing the 14th Amendment, I don't think anybody would have thought that equal protection applied to sex discrimination, or certainly not to sexual orientation. So does that mean that we've gone off in error by applying the 14th Amendment to both?Hmm, here's the language from the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause:Yes, yes. Sorry, to tell you that. ... But, you know, if indeed the current society has come to different views, that's fine. You do not need the Constitution to reflect the wishes of the current society. Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex. The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn't. Nobody ever thought that that's what it meant. Nobody ever voted for that. If the current society wants to outlaw discrimination by sex, hey we have things called legislatures, and they enact things called laws. You don't need a constitution to keep things up-to-date. All you need is a legislature and a ballot box. You don't like the death penalty anymore, that's fine. You want a right to abortion? There's nothing in the Constitution about that. But that doesn't mean you cannot prohibit it. Persuade your fellow citizens it's a good idea and pass a law. That's what democracy is all about. It's not about nine superannuated judges who have been there too long, imposing these demands on society.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.So that must mean women are neither "citizens" or "persons"?
Maybe Representative Maloney is onto something.
(Native Americans, don't even think about it.)
Either way, I'm sure glad I saved the button!
Full post as published by South Florida Lawyers on January 04, 2011 (boomark / email).
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions

Gawker Calls Scalia an 'A-Hole' as He Questions Women's Rights Under the 14th Amendment
Lash and Hamburger on Privileges or Immunities
Justice Scalia as campaign finance reform champion
Thoughts on the 14th Amendment cases
Supreme Courts 2nd Amendment ruling expected on Wed. or Thurs. of this week
SCOTUS decides Second Amendment applies to the states in 5-4 opinion










