ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

IA Judicial Selection Lawsuit is Rejected

By Peter Hardin

ADVERTISEMENTS

A lawsuit challenging part of  Iowa’s merit-selection process for choosing state Supreme Court justices was thrown out by a federal judge, who called the challengers’ argument “fatally flawed.”

The lawsuit challenged the makeup of the commission that screens candidates for Iowa?s Supreme Court and sought to stop its seven lawyer members from helping to pick finalists to replace three justices whom voters ousted in November.

The four conservatives who brought the suit contended Iowa’s system gives too much influence to the lawyers who elect fellow attorneys to the Judicial Nominating Commission, according to an Associated Press article.

U.S. District Judge Robert Pratt ruled  that the activists who sued had not shown their constitutional rights were clearly violated, a Des Moines Register article reported.

“Undoubtedly, the right to vote for political representatives is the bedrock of American democracy,” Pratt wrote. “In this case, however, plaintiffs are asking the court to radically expand the scope of this fundamental right beyond all existing precedent and to recognize an entirely new 14th Amendment ‘right’ to greater influence in the selection of judges.”

The challenge  was filed by Indiana-based lawyer James Bopp on behalf of the four individual plaintiffs.

Lawyers for Iowa?s government had asked for dismissal of the lawsuit. They contended an adverse ruling would create numerous and severe problems (see Gavel Grab for background).

An adverse ruling could undermine the legitimacy of the four remaining justices; and it could lead to questions about the validity of past court rulings and whether a new system for selecting judges might be mandated by a federal judge, the state’s lawyers maintained.

The lawsuit was filed after voters dumped three state Supreme Court justices in response to a unanimous high court ruling that permitted same-sex marriages in the state.

Full post as published by The Gavel on January 20, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/03/26 15:12:44)