Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> TalkLeft
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: TalkLeftThe John Adams Public Health Insurance Act
By Big Tent Democrat
Today appears to be John Adams Day for defenders of the individual mandate in the health bill. FTR, as I have written many times, I find the argument that the individual mandate is unconstitutional to be absurd in the extreme. Frankly, it is not a plausible constitutional objection. It is, in fact, a frivolous argument. That said, I'm not sure the Act for The Relief of Sick anf Disabled Seamen helps the legal argument that much. As Ezra Klein acknowledges:
If you read Rick Ungar's excellent explanation of the bill, you'll see it was a bit different than the individual mandate: It was a payroll tax that all sailors on private merchant ships had to pay, and in return, they were basically given access to a small public health-care system.
Making it Medicare for Sailors. The argument against the constitutionality of the individual mandate has included the idea that requiring the purchase of private insurance is what makes the individual mandate in the health bill unconstitutional and what makes it different from Medicare and Social Security. There is no logic in this distinction with regard to the Necessary and Proper Clause (as this open letter from law professors explains), but courts first decide what result they want, and come up with rationales later. More . . .
Ezra also makes the wry observation that:
[I]f conservatives really do prefer a system of payroll taxes that purchase you public insurance to the private system envisioned in the Affordable Care Act, I'm sure there are a lot of liberals who would vote for a bill that repealed the Affordable Care Act and replaced it with Medicare-for-all.
That's clever, but does miss a point - that if instead of a mandate the health bill had instead have had as a universality provision autoenrollment in a public health insurance program, we would not be having this political mandate problem right now. Not very pragmatic of the wonks on this one.
Speaking for me only
Full post as published by TalkLeft on January 21, 2011 (boomark / email).
Medicare
Guide to government health insurance for the elderly
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Health Insurance
alleging health insurance companies have forced patients to pay more than they should when using doctors and hospitals outside their insurer's networks.
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Oxford Health Insurance
$50 million refunds offered in overcharged insurance suit.
St. John Health
Agrees a $13.5 Million Settlement in Antitrust Class Action
Adams Extract & Spice
Recalls Product due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
Health Coverage Canceled
Kaiser Permanente to pay $300,000 settlement in insurance lawsuit.

John Adams Goes "Heavy Metal"- Factoring Industry Gossip Monger Inaccurate AGAIN
HBOs JOHN ADAMSJohn Adams: Great and Grating, or Ordinary and Likeable
Health Insurance Reform Mythbuster: The Cost of the Public Health Insurance Option








