Academic

A. BARTON HINKLE: CIVILITY IS NICE, NONVIOLENCE IS BETTER: The frenzy surrounding Jared Loughner?

By Glenn Reynolds

A. BARTON HINKLE: CIVILITY IS NICE, NONVIOLENCE IS BETTER:

The frenzy surrounding Jared Loughner’s rampage in Tucson this month has finally died down. As tempers cool, perhaps distance could turn reflection toward some bigger questions. Many Republicans and Democrats have lamented the frequency of violent rhetoric in politics. Fewer seem to have regrets about the actual use of violence itself.

I’m not referring here to death threats, terrorism, assassination attempts, and similar heinous acts. Nobody considers those violent deeds by non-state actors legitimate. But what about violence by the state? Liberals and conservatives alike often embrace it as a means to an end they desire. . . . The debate over the size and scope of government, then, is an argument over when to use violence to change things and circumstances consensual activity cannot. . . .. Force is sometimes necessary. We must have police and courts and national defense and environmental protection and so on. But government at all levels does much more nowadays than is strictly necessary, because both liberals and conservatives delight in using it to make other people do what they would not do through mutual consent.

In the wake of the butchery in Tucson, it has been nice to hear many people say we should not speak so well of violence. It would be even nicer to hear more say we should not vote for it quite so often, either.

Read the whole thing.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on January 22, 2011 (boomark / email).