Constitutional Law

KingCast tells Nixon Peabody's W. Scott O'Connell: "You better learn the difference between a principle and a principal before you think you can scare me on Rule 11 Sanctions against Gordon MacDonald."

By Christopher King

I read your letter but have only limited access to Internet. When I return tomorrow I will explain to you and your co-worker once again that a Complaint includes all filed materials, such as CDs. Therefore your attempts to skirt the fact that Officer Hargreaves' statements made to me at the Joe Arpaio rally were included by reference in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are principally wrong. You wrote, "Efforts to mask deficiencies in your Amended Complaint with personal attacks against others is wholly improper. Your legal training should have equipped you with this important principal."

As to your inability to grasp basic tenets of the English language, I will share that with the Free World and the Court tomorrow when I file my Motion for Sanctions. The fact that I misspoke at one point regard which event was which is of no moment, Sir. So you go on ahead and prepare to file your Motion for Attorney Fees because you don't scare me one bit. I am filing my Motion for Sanctions tomorrow afternoon.

We use video podcasting at KingCast.net and Justiceforkids.net to protect the First Amendment and highlight corporate and police abuse, such as the Ohio Board of Grievances, American Tower Corporation, Jaffrey Police Department, and the NAACP have all told material lies or unlawfully withheld evidence

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on February 07, 2011 (boomark / email).