ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

NYSE Clarifies Dodd-Frank Mandate on Voting Uninstructured Shares on Executive Compensation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS
In its 2011 corporate governance letter to domestic listed company executives, NYSE Regulation noted that Section 957 of the Dodd-Frank Act required each national securities exchange to amend its rules to prohibit member organizations from voting shares without specific client instructions in matters related to executive compensation. The NYSE advised companies on August 4, 2010 that members would be prohibited from voting uninstructed shares at all meetings held after July 21, 2010 if the matter to be voted on relates to executive compensation.

The letter also said that proposals that are included on proxy statements that involve executive compensation matters, even if they also apply to employees below executive level, will be treated as ?May Not Vote? matters, including in those cases where member organizations have previously been allowed to vote uninstructed shares, such as with respect to some plans put to a stockholder vote in order to rely on the performance-based compensation exception to the $1 million annual deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Similarly, ?say on pay?, ?say when on pay?, ?say on golden parachute? and other executive compensation proposals will be treated as ?May Not Vote? matters.

Dodd-Frank also includes similar provisions that prohibit voting of uninstructed shares by member organizations in the election of directors, excluding companies registered under the Investment Company Act, and in other matters as determined by the SEC. NYSE Rule 452 had previously been amended to eliminate broker voting in connection with the election of directors, effective for annual or special meetings as of January 1, 2010. This rule change excluded companies registered under the Investment Company Act.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on February 15, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0033 secs (from cache 11/03/26 05:12:23)