Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities RegulationHouse Agriculture Committee Leaders Question CFTC Rulemaking Implementing Dodd-Frank Derivatives Title
By Jim Hamilton
Chairman Lucas cautioned that the speed with which the CFTC is issuing derivatives rules raises concerns about the capacity of the Commission and its stakeholders to adequately analyze the costs and benefits of the rules and assess their implications. For example, in a recent comment letter filed with the CFTC, the Working Group of Commercial Energy Firms highlighted the substantial under estimation of costs by the Commission when performing cost-benefit analysis. The Working Group?s calculation of the man-hours necessary to comply with the CFTC?s rule on the duties of swap dealers and major swap participants was 63 times greater than that of the Commission.
By prioritizing speed over deliberation in writing the Title VII rules, noted the House leaders, the CFTC has created an irrational sequence of rule proposals that prevents stakeholders and the public from providing meaningful comments. Because so many of the rule proposals hinge on components of other rules, the House Ag leaders question how the Commission could have the information necessary to understand the impact of the rules currently being written when all of the rules are implemented comprehensively.
For example, in November the CFTC proposed rules on business conduct standards for major swap participants and swap dealers, but the rule providing clarification of the types of entities that would be swap dealers or major swap participants was not issued until late December. Chairman Lucas asks the CFTC to explain how staff responsible for drafting the proposed rules for business conduct standards were able to perform an adequate cost-benefit analysis without a clear understanding of the universe of entities to which the rules would apply. More broadly, the CFTC was asked if the period of time provided for Title VII rulemaking is sufficient time to conduct careful and accurate cost benefit analyses and propose rules in a sequence that supports useful public comments.
Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on February 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Women and the Law
Ttile IX
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
House Closing
Sealing a home sale
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...
School House Abuse
Selwyn House School agrees to $5 million teacher molestation settlement.
China Green Agriculture, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
China Green Agriculture, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
Trading Fraud
Former stock trader to pay $55,000 in CFTC settlement.
Frank Bluestein, The Maximum Financial Group, Inc., Questar Capital Corporation, and Gunnallen Financial, Inc.
alleging schemed investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Position Limits Rule Would Limit Swap Positions
SEC & CFTC Seek Public Comment on Mixed Swaps
The CFTCs Latest Dodd Frank Endeavor
The (Re)regulation of Financial Derivatives
Committee on Capital Markets Regulation Warns of Hasty Rulemaking under Dodd-Frank







