Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGArgument preview: Pretrial motions and calculating deadlines under the Speedy Trial Act
By Adam Schlossman
On Tuesday, in United States v. Tinklenberg, the Court will consider whether the time between the filing of a pretrial motion and its disposition is automatically excluded from the deadline for commencing trial under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, or is instead excluded only if the motion actually causes a postponement, or the expectation of a postponement, of the trial.
Brooks Holland of Gonzaga University School of Law previews the case for the American Bar Association?s PREVIEW of U.S. Supreme Court Cases; the ABA has generously agreed to share some of its previews ? which are authored by practitioners and scholars in the field ? with SCOTUSblog. You can read Professor Holland?s preview here; PREVIEW?s website is here.
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on February 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...

Supreme Court rules pretrial motion time not excluded under Speedy Trial Act
Preserve speedy trial rights by objecting to continuances and other delays.
"Review: Deadlines On Demand "
Speedy Trial Act Violated; District Court Gets to Decide if Dismissal Should Be With Prejudice










