Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Religion ClauseUsing Prison Chapel As Courtroom Violates Establishment Clause; But Harmless Error
By Howard M. Friedman
ADVERTISEMENTS
Jones County, Texas has designated the Chapel at the French Robertson Unit of the Department of Criminal Justice as a branch courthouse. It is used for non-jury proceedings when French Roberson inmates are charged with offenses. In Lilly v. State of Texas, (TX App., Feb. 17, 2011), an inmate who pleaded guilty to assaulting a public servant challenged on free exercise and Establishment Clause grounds the holding of his criminal proceedings in the Chapel which contains various religious depictions. The court concluded that use of the Chapel constituted an Establishment Clause violation, saying:If it is appropriate to use a Christian chapel as a courtroom, it must also be permissible to use a synagogue, mosque, or temple for the same purpose. A reasonable observer watching a trial in any of these facilities would perceive that a message supporting that particular religion was being sent to those in attendance.The court went on to conclude however that the Establishment Clause violation played no role in petitioner's decision to plead guilty, so there is no basis to reverse his conviction or sentence.
Full post as published by Religion Clause on February 20, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Lawsuits and Settlements
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Ninth Circuit Panel Holds That Mt. Soledad War Memorial Cross Violates Establishment Clause
Do EPA Regulations on CO2 Emissions Violate the Establishment Clause
10th Circuit Holds 10 Commandments Monument Violates Establishment Clause
Jayme Biendl: Prison Guard Strangled At Washington State Prison Chapel








