
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
CalBizLit 

Thoughts, observations, notes and commentary on California litigation.
Post Frequency: 1.9/day Last Entry: March 28, 2011 at 13:00:00 Recent Entries: 257
Go to CalBizLit, find other Litigation blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Search
Posts
Punitive Damage Award Reversed Based on Erroneous Admission of Other Dissimilar Instances
Posted on March 05, 2008Interesting application of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Campbell (2003) 538 U.S. 408 in the California context in yesterday's decision in Holdgrafer v. Unocal Corp. (2008) ___ Cal.App. 4th ___ (2d Civil No. B175953). Unocal (now owned by...
Wrongful Termination Case Based on Labor Code Section 232.5 is Preempted by NLRA
Posted on February 18, 2008California has two statutes, Labor Code sections 232 and 232.5, that protect the rights of employees to disclose information about their compensation or working conditions. The first, Labor Code section 232, was enacted in 1984, provides: No employer may do...
Reid v. Google: Evidentiary Objections in Summary Judgment Motions
Posted on February 01, 2008In practice areas where practitioners make heavy use of motions for summary judgment, there's been an ongoing controversy over how the courts treat evidentiary objections. Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1410 held that a trial court...
How Not to Give References
Posted on January 29, 2008Most employer's attorneys advise their clients that when an inquiry is made about a former employee, the employer should limit the response to confirming the former employee's dates of employment and job title. There are two reasons for this: avoiding...
Not Such A Good Way to Defend A Prop 65 Case
Posted on January 25, 2008Under Proposition 65 (Health and Safety Code Section 25249.5 and following), a private party enforcer (or bounty hunter) can sue any employer of ten or more persons who has exposed persons to carcinogens or reproductive toxicants on the governor?s lists...
Attorneys' Fees in Motions to Compel Arbitration
Posted on January 23, 2008California's appellate courts have issued many decisions in the past several years on binding arbitration provisions in consumer and employment contexts, which are typically non-negotiated contracts of adhesion. But here's a commercial arbitration case (involving negotiated contracts and equal and...
How Not to Write An Employee Handbook
Posted on January 21, 2008The Peters Law Group in Southern California is a small firm representing employees in discrimination, harassment and other litigation. They also publish the often excellent California Employee Rights Blog. Over the weekend, they published an amazing post on Tribune Co...
California -- Not a Judicial Hell Hole?
Posted on December 20, 2007In April, the Chamber of Commerce published its list of judicial hellholes, giving California sixth place for the worst in the country, as I reported here. At year end, here comes the judicial hellhole listing from the American Tort Reform...
Mandatory Arbitration in Employment Contracts
Posted on December 18, 2007Today's guest blawger is Michael Sachs, who practices employment law with our firm. Today's Wall Street Journal discusses the increasing use of arbitration provisions in employment agreements. The WSJ estimates as many as 20% of all businesses require employees to...
Pro-Defense Lockheed Gatekeeper Decision -- Gone for Good
Posted on December 14, 2007I blogged a couple of times (here and here) and in a white paper about the Court of Appeals' decision in Lockheed Litigation Cases, where, despite the fact that Daubert has never been adopted in this state, the Court suggested...
Coupon Settlement in Ford Explorer Class Action
Posted on December 04, 2007For months, I wanted to write a post on the Ford Explorer UCL litigation pending in Sacramento Superior Court, (Ford Explorer Cases, JCCP Nos. 4266 and 4270), but I never got around to it. The cases -- discussed at some...
Breaking News: Big Win for Automobile Dealers in Lease Documents Cases
Posted on November 29, 2007For at least seven years, plaintiffs' counsel have tenaciously prosecuted In re Vehicle Lease Documents Cases (Trygar) in Los Angeles Superior Court. This Unfair Competition Law case was brought by Ed Masry (of Erin Brockovich fame) on behalf of Louis...
Defense Verdict in JDS Uniphase Trial
Posted on November 27, 2007There is probably no jury verdict more likely to strike fear in the hearts of board members and officers everywhere than a securities trial verdict. The amounts at stake are nearly always mind-boggling, the cases involve concepts not exactly familiar...
Why Corporate Defendants Like the Federal Courts
Posted on November 21, 2007I blogged not long ago (and there's also a discussion in my product liability white paper) on Lockheed Litigation Cases, a Court of Appeal decision upholding a California trial judge for performing something that looked a lot like Daubert gate-keeping...
Staples Wage and Hour Settlement
Posted on November 20, 2007The focus of this blog is not employment law, and there are other blogs (Storm on the employer side, Wage Law on the employee side) whose authors do an excellent job in this field. But anybody who conducts any kind...
Another Boomer Verdict From the Electronics World
Posted on November 18, 2007Verdict Search California (subs. req.) reports on the September, 2007 verdict for UniRamTechnology, Inc. against Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC). UniRam shared some proprietary semiconductor design information with TSMC under an NDA, while they explored having TSMC manufacture the semiconductors...
The Real Reasons for Litigation Delay
Posted on November 15, 2007Say what you will about California. Sometimes we have a sense of humor, and sometimes we have manners. Sometimes we have both. Tentative ruling from Judge Barbara Zuniga from Contra Costa Superior Court (one of the nicer people on the...
Previous
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









