OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
Patentablydefined.com 

Patent prosecution strategies and techniques.
Post Frequency: 0.4/day Last Entry: April 07, 2010 at 15:03:36 Recent Entries: 74
By Michael E. Kondoudis
Go to Patentablydefined.com, find other Patent Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Search
Posts
A Case for Citing to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure
Posted on December 10, 2007© 2007, Michael E. Kondoudis I recently had a debate with a colleague about whether it is preferable to cite the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) or to court/board decisions in support of a patentability argument. Although this is an open question, in my experience, citing the MPEP has been more effective...
The Benefits of Efficient Responses and Approaches for Efficiently Responding to Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. §103
Posted on November 20, 2007© 2007, Michael E. Kondoudis There is an old saying that ?sometimes, less is more.? This advice has particular applicability to patent prosecution where, with each word written, an Applicant risks generating argument estoppel. Additionally, each written word presents with it an inherent risk of introducing error...
Announcing My New Law Firm - The Law Office of Michael E. Kondoudis, PC.
Posted on November 06, 2007My apologies, everyone, for the infrequency of the postings on this blog as of late, but there has been quite a bit going on. After months of preparation, I am pleased to announce that I have started my own practice. It is both a challenging and exciting endeavor, and those are two good reasons [...
See You At The AIPLA?s Annual Meeting
Posted on October 18, 2007By Michael E. Kondoudis I will be attending the American Intellectual Property Law Association annual meeting here in Washington, DC. today and tomorrow. One of the more enjoyable aspects of conferences like this one is meeting readers of this blog. If you are going to be there, look for me...
Obviousness After KSR - The U.S. Patent Office?s New Published Examination Guidelines
Posted on October 10, 2007The U.S. Patent Office has just published new examination guidelines for determining obviousness in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. The published guidelines can be found here. Ramifications of this important decision were discussed in this earlier post...
A Technique to Assert the Patentable Weight of a Claim Preamble
Posted on October 05, 2007© 2007, Michael E. Kondoudis The Patentable Weight of a Claim Preamble Generally, during the examination of an application, an Examiner attempts to rebut the novelty and non-obviousness of a claim by identifying, in the prior art, teachings or suggestions of each feature of that claim...
Previous
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









