Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBruner on Good Faith & Lyondell Chemical Company v. Ryan
By Lawrence Solum
Christopher M. Bruner (Washington and Lee University - School of Law) has posted Good Faith in Revlon-Land (New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 55, 2010/11) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
-
The Delaware Supreme Court has set a very high hurdle for plaintiffs challenging directors' good faith in the sale of a company. In Lyondell Chemical Company v. Ryan, the court held that unconflicted directors could be found to have breached the good faith component of their duty of loyalty in the transactional context only if they "knowingly and completely failed to undertake," and "utterly failed to attempt" to discharge their duties.
In this essay I argue that the Lyondell standard effectively imports into the transactional context the exacting standard previously applied in the oversight context ? a move clearly aimed at substantially limiting directors' liability exposure for conscious disregard of duty. Part I of the essay traces the evolution of the good faith concept over recent decades, including the Delaware Supreme Court's acceptance in its 2006 Disney opinion of a formulation of non-exculpable bad faith conduct by unconflicted directors in the employment context involving "intentional" and "conscious" disregard of duty. Part II contrasts this strict state of mind requirement with an even stricter standard applied later that year in Stone v. Ritter to establish bad faith in the board oversight context. I then turn to Lyondell, where the Delaware Supreme Court in 2009 extended the exacting standard of Stone to the transactional context.
Commentary on Lyondell has suggested that the decision effectively forecloses monetary liability for unconflicted directors in the transactional context. I argue in Part III, however, that while the opinion undoubtedly limits directors' liability exposure, it is amenable to a reading that preserves some limited capacity for the good faith component of the duty of loyalty to discipline boards in the sale of a company.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on January 14, 2011 (boomark / email).
California Limited Liability Company Formation
Relevant information for starting a limited liability company in California
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Allstate Settles Bad-Faith Insurance Suit for $4 Million
Allstate Settles Bad-Faith Insurance Suit for $4 Million
Chemical Companies
alleging danger to people living near the plants.
Hazardous Chemical Spill
500 Evacuated from Denver Area Hospital
Farmers Insurance
Settles Bad Faith Class Action
Chemical Plant Explosion
CHEMCENTRAL Midwest Corporation agrees to $375,000 settlement for safety violations.
Bad Faith Estimate
Quality First Auto Glass pays $233,000 settlement in automotive lawsuit.

The Big Reversal: Lyondell Chemical Company v. Ryan
Ryan v Lyondell: Good Faith Reappears
Lyondell Chemical Co. v. Ryan and Delaware's (Counter-)Cyclical Jurisprudence







