Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogCoenen on the Signatures to the Constitution
By Lawrence Solum
ADVERTISEMENTS
Michael Coenen has posted The Significance of Signatures: Why the Framers Signed the Constitution and What They Meant by Doing So
(Yale Law Journal, Forthcoming). on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:-
The signing of the U.S. Constitution is traditionally understood as the closing act of the Constitutional Convention. This Note provides an alternative account, one that understands the Constitution?s signing as the opening act of the ratification campaign that followed in the Convention?s wake. To begin, the Note explains the signatures? ambiguous form as the product of political maneuvering designed to win support for the Constitution during ratification. The Note then hypothesizes two ways in which the signatures may have helped to secure this support: (1) by highlighting pro-Constitution selling-points likely to resonate with the ratifying public; and (2) by limiting the ability of the signers? to recant their support for the Constitution once ratification battles had begun. Finally, the Note identifies a few respects in which this ratification-centered account of the Constitution?s signing may influence our modern-day understanding of the document.
-
The standard account of the Constitution?s signing places the event in the final chapter of the Philadelphia story.61 But there is an alternative account?one that situates the signing in the first chapter of the ratification story. On this account, the signing of the Constitution makes sense not as an act looking back to the grueling efforts of the summer of 1787, but as an act looking forward to the upcoming fight for ratification. The signing, in other words, represented not so much a closing coda to the framers? work, but rather an opening salvo to the ratifiers? work?an act intended to generate and to maintain support for the document throughout the ratification process.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on November 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Protect Marriage Washington: Sec. of State gets 138,000 signatures supporting Referendum 71
Hotel Coenen in Mönchengladbach, Germany
Colorado Pro-Life Group Submits Near-Double Signatures for Abortion Amdt
Playing Games With the Date Next to the Signature








