Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogGardner on Voter Dignity & Constitutional Rights in the Democratic Process
By Lawrence Solum
James A. Gardner (University at Buffalo Law School, SUNY) has posted The Dignity of Voters - A Dissent (University of Miami Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Since the waning days of the Burger Court, the federal judiciary has developed a generally well-deserved reputation for hostility to constitutional claims of individual right. In the field of democratic process, however, the Supreme Court has not only affirmed and expanded the applications of previously recognized rights, but has also regularly recognized new individual rights and deployed them with considerable vigor. The latest manifestation of this trend appears to be the emergence of a new species of vote dilution claim that recognizes a constitutionally grounded right against having one?s vote ?cancelled out? by fraud or error in the casting and counting of ballots. I argue here that an important reason for the Court?s anomalous commitment to a robust regime of individual rights in the democratic arena is its conception of the dignity of voters. Rather than approach issues involving democratic process as problems of power or of the proper functioning of a system of representative democracy, the Court instead approaches such issues as problems of the maltreatment of individual voters. This, I shall argue, is a serious mistake in two ways. First, the Court has failed to distinguish among different kinds of rights, and it therefore misuses them. Second, the Court ought not to conceive of voters as bearers of a kind of dignity equivalent to the dignity that all people enjoy in virtue of their humanity ? the traditional basis for recognizing individual rights. Instead, I argue, voters are better treated for some constitutional purposes as public officials discharging a public duty, and as therefore entitled either to no particular dignitary rights, or to dignitary rights that are greatly diminished.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 21, 2009 (boomark / email).
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
Cowboy Hat
Lincoln County pays citizen $10,500 settlement for Constitutional Rights violations.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Right-of-Way
City of Hastings pays preacher $1 settlement and $10,000 in legal fees for constitutional right violations.
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans

Dignity and the Politics of Protection: Abortion Restrictions Under Casey/Carhart
Montana Court approves assisted suicide
Dignity, Freedom and South African Constitutional Justice Ackerman: Robson's Saturday Evening Review
Dignity Interests in Constitutional Law:








