Academic

JOHN MCWHORTER IN THE NEW REPUBLIC: Is The CBC Uniquely Unethical? Why, then, would Rangel be so?

By Glenn Reynolds

JOHN MCWHORTER IN THE NEW REPUBLIC: Is The CBC Uniquely Unethical?

Why, then, would Rangel be so, as he himself put it, ?sloppy? in policing the line between serving larger interests and serving himself, or at least the appearances thereof? Here, after all is the man who came into office watching his predecessor?Adam Clayton Powell, Jr.?dragged down for ethical lapses hardly unknown among white peers.

Racism is, I suspect, part of the story here?but not in the way we?re supposed to think. Is there a part of Rangel that has supposed that the ethics are fundamentally different for him since his nonprofit is devoted to battling the legacies of institutional racism? The CBC traditionally calls itself ?the conscience of Congress,? and in its public statements and activities often functions as a kind of alternate NAACP rather than as a generator of legislation. Under this frame of mind, there would be little difference between serving ?myself? and serving ?my people.? Surely to combat racism is a greater good than any other. My nonprofit is the fight against racism. The fight against racism is me. Me is the fight against racism. Why not improvise a little, especially if no one is looking?

This seems to be the only kind of explanation, given data in so far, on Maxine Waters? transgression. . . . Especially if no one was looking. After all, look at what she has sometimes done even while people were looking?I will never forget her dancing on camera with L.A. gang members.

Read the whole thing. (Via Damon Root.)

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on August 05, 2010 (boomark / email).