ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Minneti on Regulation of Environmental Marketing Claims

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS
Jeffrey Minneti (Stetson University College of Law) has posted Is it Too Easy Being Green? A Behavioral Economics Approach to Determining Whether to Regulate Environmental Marketing Claims (Loyola Law Review, New Orleans, Vol. 55, No. 4, p. 653, 2009) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
    Employing principles derived from rational choice theory and behavioral economics, this article advocates the promulgation of administrative rules to govern the environmental claims sellers make about their products. The article asserts that the FTC?s current regulatory scheme, a case-by-case approach that draws upon a set of industry guidelines (called the Green Guides), is essentially impotent when considered in light of the frequency with which products in today?s market bear false or misleading environmental claims. The article is especially timely, because the FTC is currently engaged in its own evaluation of the Green Guides? effectiveness. While traditional rational choice theorists may argue that market competition alone may drive products with false or misleading claims from the market, bounds on consumers? rationality and self interest keep them from being able to make optimal purchase decisions, and as a result, market competition itself is unable to weed out bogus environmental claims. The regulation of environmental claims, while arguably paternalistic, is desirable, because in addition to ultimately helping the environment, the benefits it would provide to boundedly rational consumers exceed the costs such regulation may impose on informed or rational consumers, even when discounting the boundedly rational consumers? benefit by any loss the group would sustain from the moral or cognitive hazard of not being able to learn for themselves which products bear false or misleading claims.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 05:18:20)