Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Instapundit.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Instapundit.comTHE ORWELL HEARING: Dems Warp Meaning of ?Court Packing.? The Democratic Party?s presidential?
By Ed Driscoll
THE ORWELL HEARING: Dems Warp Meaning of ?Court Packing.?
The Democratic Party?s presidential nominee Joe Biden, a man who vows to bring normalcy back to a battered nation, is unable to tell voters whether he supports a plan to destroy the American judicial system.
Of course, if Biden promises he won?t pack the courts in retaliation for the likely confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, the sizable anti-constitutional wing of his party will be enraged. If he promises to do it, the brittle façade of ?moderation? will be smashed.
Biden, who once argued that FDR?s court-packing scheme had been a great corruption of power, hasn?t been able to wave away the question. Last week, he told a local reporter that voters would find out his answer on court packing after the election. When asked whether he believed that voters ?deserved? to know before they voted, he responded that, no, they did not. (These are the same Democrats, incidentally, who contend that confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett should be postponed because Americans are already voting.)
All of this is an unexpected dilemma for Democrats, whose candidate seldom faces a challenging query from, well, just about anyone. Unable to wave away the controversy, liberals have decided to run with full-blown doublespeak, deliberately obfuscating, warping, and reversing the meaning of ?court packing.? And most of the political media responded by asking, ?Whose car are we taking??
Another Orwellianism by Democrats at the start of Barrett?s hearing: ?Where?s MY picture?!? Dems dragged for shamelessly placing pics of people ?who will lose? healthcare in front of ACB at #SCOTUSHearing.
Obama?s repeated ?If you like your plan you can keep your plan? lies were so outrageous, even his fellow Democrats at ?Politifact? couldn?t ignore it, dubbng it their ?Lie of the Year? in 2013.
Full post as published by Instapundit.com on October 12, 2020 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Settlement
Third Party Mobile Content Charges Class Action Settlement
Google Inc.
alleging deceptive charges for ads displayed on third party web sites.
Underage DUI
Minor injured in car accident after a Halloween party is awarded $1.5 million.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Cell Phone Services
AT&T Mobility may have to pay $10 million to Florida customers after charging for third-party services.








