Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: ConglomerateOpen source movies
By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring
Last week I attended an enjoyable and thought-provoking Illinois Business Law and Policy roundtable on the portrayal of business in film. I was admittedly skeptical about our host Larry Ribstein's thesis, that business is portrayed negatively in American film because of "film artists? resentment of the constraint that capitalists put on their self-expression."
After a day of prawf theorizing on the motives of filmmakers and their relationship with corporations, the roundtable had a visit from a "real specimen": independent filmmaker Nina Paley, whose movie, Sita Sings the Blues, was a part of Ebertfest and is available free for download. Right now. Seriously, if you want to see it, just go here, and it's yours.
Nina convinced me that Larry may be on to something, although I'm not sure how representative shewas as an American filmmaker--for one thing, she was excited to talk to a group of law professors! She certainly resents the constraints that certain capitalists--copyright-holders--put on her ability to use America's culture. And she's putting her money where her mouth is, literally giving her work away. Here's more on her philosophy.
I don't do much with intellectual property, but I remember as an associate having to learn the ins and outs of open source licenses and being enchanted by the idea of copyleft. Basically it allows anyone to access, use, and modify programming code--the catch is, you can't exclude others from doing the same to your improvements and additions. What you get free stays free. But you can (and companies like Red Hat do) still try to make money by providing services to help you use open source software. Open source made my job (figuring out who had what rights to a target company's software, for example) harder, but also a lot more interesting.
Translated into the movies, open source means that you can take Nina's movie and make it into anything you want--Sita as punk rocker, for example--as long as you attribute the original work to her. But then you have to make it available for free online, too. Nina says she's making more money now that her movie is available online: she can sell DVDs, T-shirts, and her film is in demand. It's a radical rethinking property rights and what makes value, and Nina is up against the entertainment-industrial complex. I hope she wins.
Full post as published by Conglomerate on April 28, 2009 (boomark / email).
Best Law Movies
Greatest Legal Movies selected by ABA Journal
Nationwide Recall Of All Lots Of Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap
Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap All Lots Recalled Nationally
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
Wegmans Food Market
alleging the retailer revealed too much information on their credit and debit card receipts, violating the FACTA law, and leaving customers open to identity theft

Open Source Here in Google, There in Quebec, and Maybe Everywhere
Open Source Software Ready for the Business World
Open Source Compliance (On Your Own Terms)
United Kingdom moves ahead with Open Source
Open Source Resources for Writers









