ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

How have rating agencies escaped?

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

So much for my ability to make political predictions.  I thought that the logical first target of financial reform would be the rating agencies.  Everyone seemed to agree that have repeatedly done a poor job in predicting bond defaults -- from the Enron era (and before!) up to the current crisis.  The rating agencies don't seem to have large political constituencies. 

So what happened?  A tepid set of SEC regulations -- encouraging new NRSROs (say that 10 times backwards) to register with the commission, imposing a few conflict of interest rules, requiring a few new disclosures from the NRSROs on their historical performance in making downgrades -- but nothing spectacular.  Not surprisingly, limited reforms have had limited success.  No new rating agency has achieved significant market share.  It isn't clear what additional disclosures will actually do.  With the big rating agencies enjoying both government-granted oligopoly power (see Partnoy) and a first-mover advantage, do investors have a meaningful choice? 

We could ask, per Claire Hill, why anyone pays attention to rating agencies any more?  Going back to Partnoy, one answer is that rating agency determinations are hardwired into a multitude of securities, banking, and insurance regulations.  If various regulated financial entities want to invest in debt, they must find securities rated "investment grade" by an NRSRO. 

Which brings us back to my ineptitude at political prediction and the question in the title of this post - "how have rating agencies escaped?"  Public choice provides a simple answer - it isn't surprising that a small group of institutions with a big stake in regulation and significant resources can stop meaningful reform. 

But there is a deeper problem suggested by Partnoy's scholarship.  What would we replace rating agency ratings with?  As noted above, myriad financial regulations delegate to ratings the basic function of regulating risk-taking by financial institutions.  What would we replace ratings with?  I'll explore some ideas in later posts.  But the rating agency oligopoly is not easily undone -- the agencies are deeply embedded in U.S. regulation.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on March 31, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/02/26 21:17:25)