Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Alabama Appellate WatchArgument Must Be Raised To Trial Court To Preserve For Appeal
By Ivan B. Cooper
In this interesting case involving Homeowners' Associations, restrictive covenants, and what actually is an acceptable driveway, one of the issues was disposed of on appeal because it was not raised first to the trial court. Grove Hill Homeowners' Association, Inc. v. Rice, [Ms. 2081093] (Ala. Civ. App. Feb. 5, 2010).
The Homeowners' Association sued homeowners seeking to have the homeowners forced to remove and rebuild their driveway. The driveway was constructed out of liquid asphalt and loose pea gravel. The restrictive covenants required that all driveways be constructed of asphalt or concrete, and provided that gravel and loose stone driveways were prohibited. The driveway at issue, however, appeared to be a combination. The trial court found that the restrictive covenant was ambiguous and denied the injunction.
On appeal, the Homeowners' Association argued that the trial court failed to use the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard of review in reviewing the Homeowners' Association decision on the driveway and instead reviewed the issue de novo. But the Court of Civil Appeals refused to consider this argument because it was not raised in the trial court first. "In order to preserve an alleged error of law for appellate review, the appellant must bring that alleged error to the attention of the trial court and receive an adverse ruling." Slip Op. p. 10. The Homeowners' Association did not file a post-judgment motion setting out this alleged error, therefore, the error could not be raised on appeal.
But ultimately, the Court of Civil Appeals sided with the Homeowners' Association. The Court found that there was no ambiguity and that the restrictive covenants prohibited the driveway at issue. The Court remanded the case back to the trial court to determine whether the Homeowners' Association had met all other elements necessary to obtain an injunction.
Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on February 18, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Albertsons et al.
allegedly injected dye into farm raised salmon to make it appear more palatable.
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Tyson Foods
accused of deceptively marketing its chicken as "raised without antibiotics"
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Argument Raised For First Time On Motion For Reconsideration Waived For Appeal
Preserve speedy trial rights by objecting to continuances and other delays.
Post-Trial Motion Necessary To Preserve Appeal Issue In Directed Verdict Case
Illinois Supreme Court Considers Limitations Defense Raised For First Time On Appeal









