ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Bankruptcy

: Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog

Little Johnnie's Car, and Mere Title in the Arizona Chapter 7 or 13 Proceeding

By Joseph McDaniel, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
So why would little Johnnie's car come up as an issue in so many Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases in Arizona?

Well, it's pretty simple.

Debtors in Chapter 7 cases (to make this simple, I'm talking about Chapter 13 cases; but the Arizona exemption laws have application in Chapter 13 cases. It's just a little different application than in Chapter 7 cases.) often have three cars, bought and paid for.

One car for mommie, one for daddy, and one for little Johnnie.

But all three are titled in the name of the parents.

And only little Johnnie has made payments on his car.

So what happens in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy when three cars show up on title for mom and dad?

And to keep it simple, they're all worth exactly five thousand dollars, so all would qualify as exempt under the Arizona exemption statute for cars, except that the debtors in a joint case get ONE car each, not one and a half.

Well, often, there's NOT a problem, because little Johnnie has made every single payment on his car from his own account from his own job flipping burgers.

So why is title in parent's name? Either because little Johnnie couldn't get a loan, or couldn't get car insurance.

Under that specific circumstance, the bankruptcy trustee in mom and dad's joint Chapter 7 bankruptcy might very well decide not to attempt to administer the case.

Excessive compassion? Early dementia? Neither one.

The relevant bankruptcy statute is 11 USC 541, entitled "Property of the Estate"; the legislative history to the New Code (that is, the Code that went into effect when my hair was a different color) discusses the idea of "mere legal title" without equitable title.

And under THAT specific pattern of facts, there may well not be a problem.

When would a problem show up?

Well, if little Johnnie can't show a trail of payments, or if little Johnnie made some payments and mommie and daddy made some, or even one, there might be a problem; or if mommie and daddy made the down payment and then little Johnnie made all the payments thereafter. I'll discuss the variations in later posts.

Full post as published by Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney Blog on May 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/04/26 12:01:00)