Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Bankruptcy Blogs -> Credit Slips
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Bankruptcy
: Credit SlipsNot so fast (says GM)
By Stephen Lubben
The debtors have filed an objection to the motions to expedite the appeal to the 2d Circuit. In short, the debtors argue
The issues that the Movants wish to raise on appeal do not rise to matters of public importance. Rather, the interests that they wish to champion are their own (in the Individual Accident Litigants? words, ?[c]ertifying the . . . appeal will materially advance the . . . determination of their rights against the Purchaser?): that is, the Movants want certification as to claims of a handful of individual tort litigants who assert, but have not yet even prevailed on, alleged prepetition claims that can and will be addressed in the administration of the chapter 11 cases.
The debtors also argue against a stay pending appeal, and argue that if the court does grant such a stay it should be conditioned on the posting of a substantial bond. The bankruptcy court hearing on these motions is scheduled to begin right now.
I do think the debtors are right to highlight the extent to which the appellants seem to be pursuing an appeal for the sake of legal clarity -- the federal courts, unlike some state courts (e.g., New Hampshire), have strong rules against issuing "advisory opinions" that clarify the law without influencing the outcome of the pending case.
Full post as published by Credit Slips on July 07, 2009 (boomark / email).
Slim-Fast Recalled in US
Slim-Fast recalled in US

Some Recent Decisions of Note on Fast Track Disparity and Unconstitutionality of Gun Possession Laws
Adverbs at work: slow and slowly
Once a Fast Food Junkie, Always a Fast Food Junkie







