Class Action

New Ninth Circuit UCL opinion: Rubio v. Capital One Bank

By Kimberly A. Kralowec

In Rubio v. Capital One Bank, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. Jul. 21, 2010), the Ninth Circuit addressed UCL standing and held that loss of a line of credit constitutes a loss of money or property sufficient to confer Prop. 64 standing.  Slip op. at 10400-01. 

The court also noted the split in authority on the definition of "unfair," but found it unnecessary to choose between the different definitions because the defendant's conduct was unfair under both.  Slip op. at 1042.

Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on August 02, 2010 (boomark / email).