Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Blog of Rights
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: Blog of RightsDefendants 2 through 2,000
By Rachel Myers, ACLU
Update! The judge in two movie industry lawsuits against BitTorrent users has ordered the plaintiffs to explain why they lumped thousands of users into only two lawsuits. U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer of the District of Columbia issued orders in each of the cases yesterday requiring the plaintiff to show in writing by June 21 why all of the defendants except one in each case (that's defendants 2 through 2,000 in one case, 2 through 4,577 in the other) shouldn't be dismissed under a federal rule governing when defendants can and can't be joined together in one lawsuit.
Last week, we filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of Time Warner Cable's motion to quash or modify the subpoenas it received for information about thousands of users who allegedly downloaded certain movies from the Internet using the BitTorrent file sharing application. We argue that the subpoenas, which lump thousands of otherwise-unrelated individuals into a few cases filed in a court far from where any of them live, violate the individual users' rights to due process and anonymity and don't give them an adequate chance to defend themselves.
We'll see what the movie industry folks have to say.
Full post as published by Blog of Rights on June 08, 2010 (boomark / email).

Are most felony pro se defendants ill-served by the decision to self-represent
After Two Months, Montco Behavioral Health Court Expands
lawyerless defendants file suit in Georgia
Defendants should not have to pay for being wrongly prosecuted - discuss
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Four Co-Defendants Seek to Plead Guilty
Defendants cheat Social Security, but claim its the governments fault









