ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> First Amendment Center

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: First Amendment Center

House panel wants info on Homeland Security FOIA policy

By By The Associated Press

ADVERTISEMENTS

WASHINGTON — A House committee has asked the Homeland Security Department to provide documents about an agency policy that required political appointees to review many Freedom of Information Act requests, according to a letter obtained Jan. 16 by the Associated Press.

The letter to Homeland Security was sent Jan. 14 by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. It represents an early move by House Republicans who have vowed to launch numerous probes of President Barack Obama?s administration, ranging from its implementation of the new health-care law to rules curbing air pollution to spending in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Associated Press reported in July that for at least a year, Homeland Security had sidetracked hundreds of requests for federal records to top political advisers to the department?s secretary, Janet Napolitano. The political appointees wanted information about those requesting the materials, and in some cases the release of documents considered politically sensitive was delayed, according to numerous e-mails that were obtained by the AP.

FOIA is supposed to ensure the quick public release of requested government documents without political consideration. Obama has said his administration would emphasize openness in providing requested federal records.

According to Issa?s letter, Homeland Security?s chief privacy officer and FOIA official told committee staff in September that political appointees were simply made aware of ?significant and potentially controversial requests.?

Mary Ellen Callahan told them that political appointees reviewed the agency?s FOIA response letters for grammatical and other errors and did not edit or delay their release, the letter states. She also told the committee that Homeland Security abandoned the practice in response to the AP?s article, according to Issa?s letter.

On Jan. 16, Oversight panel spokesman Frederick Hill said Issa sent the letter ?because the committee has received documents that raise questions about the veracity of DHS officials? on the matter. He did not elaborate.

Issa asked the agency to provide the documents by Jan. 29.

Homeland Security spokesman Matt Chandler said Jan. 16 that his agency reduced its backlog of FOI requests last year by 40% and had handled more requests for records than any other agency. He said the department followed Obama administration policy and had not withheld or edited any records that agency lawyers considered appropriate to release.

Chandler also said Callahan did not tell Issa?s committee that the policy had been changed because of the AP?s story.

Last summer, officials said fewer than 500 requests were vetted by political officials. The department received about 103,000 requests for information in a recent 12-month period.

The agency?s directive said political appointees wanted to see FOIA requests for ?awareness purposes,? regardless of who had filed them. The AP reported that the agency?s career employees were told to provide political appointees with information about who requested documents, where they lived, whether they were reporters and where they worked.

According to the directive, political aides were to review requests related to Obama policy priorities or anything related to controversial or sensitive subjects. Requests from journalists, lawmakers and activist groups were to also to be examined.

Under a new policy set last summer, documents are given to agency political advisers three days before they are released, but they can be distributed without those officials? approval.

Full post as published by First Amendment Center on January 17, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0037 secs (from cache 11/02/26 22:27:20)