ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> TortDeform.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: TortDeform.com

Florida Wants To Allow Irrelevant Evidence In Automotive Defect Lawsuits

By Justinian Lane

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here?s a hypothetical for you.  Imagine that a guy is incredibly drunk ? say twice the legal limit.  He gets in his car to start it up, and as soon as he turns the key, a defectively-designed fuel pump ignites the gas tank.  The car blows up, and kills him instantly.  The exact same result would have happened to a sober person.  Should the jury hear evidence that the guy was drunk?  No.  The reason why is that the driver?s intoxication has no bearing upon whether or not the fuel pump was defectively-designed.

At the behest of the auto industry, Florida is trying to pass a bill that will allow irrelevant evidence in automotive defect lawsuits:

The bill specifically boosts protections for automakers by allowing them to present more evidence when they are sued for product defects that result in enhanced injury following a crash. Florida is among a handful of states that consider a crash -- and any fault of the driver in that crash -- unrelated and irrelevant to injuries caused by defective parts or design.

In 2001, the Florida Supreme Court ruled against Ford, saying manufacturers could be held solely liable for design defects that enhanced the injury suffered in a crash, regardless of who was at fault in the crash itself.

The court's rationale for excluding evidence of the driver's fault in causing an accident is that the accident-causing fault is not relevant to whether an automobile manufacturer designed a defective product.

Source: Year's First Major Tort Bill Sails in Senate Judiciary | Sunshine State News

?Enhanced injury cases? are those in which a defectively designed part did not cause the crash, but increased the injuries sustained in the crash.  And whether the driver was drunk, speeding, or otherwise driving irresponsibly shouldn?t be admissible in determining whether the part was defectively designed.

My prediction: This bill will easily pass, and will be described as bringing ?fairness? and ?common sense? back to the Florida tort system.  It?s only January, but I?m confident this will be the worst year for the civil justice system since the bloodbath that was 1986-1987.

Full post as published by TortDeform.com on January 13, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/02/26 01:51:14)