ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS


SIFMA Objects to Mandated Fiduciary Duty for Swaps Dealers

The revised draft of the Senate financial reform bill, S3217, would impose a fiduciary duty on swap dealers with regard providing advice to or entering into a swap with Governmenta units, such as states, state agencies, cities and counties and other political subdivisions of a state or federal agency. Similarly, under Section 731, a swap dealer that provides advice regarding, or offers to enter into, or enters into a swap with a pension plan, endowment, or retirement plan must have a fiduciary duty to the pension plan, endowment, or retirement plan, as appropriate.

Section 731 of S 3217 deals with the regulation of swap dealers. It was incorporated into S 3217 from the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act, which was recently reported out of the Agriculture Committee.

In a letter to Senate Agriculture Chair Blanche Lincoln and Senator Saxby Chambliss, the Ranking Member, SIFMA said that the swap dealer is a counterparty to and on the opposite side of the table from the governmental entity or pension fund and thus has interests that are inherently opposite to the other party. Since fiduciaries have a duty to place the interests of their principal above their own, reasoned SIFMA, it is inconsistent for a swap dealer, as a counterparty, to act as a fiduciary. One counterparty could never negotiate a transaction with another counterparty whose interests must be paramount to its own. Faced with this dilemma, predicted SIFMA, dealers would decline to do business with these entities, thereby denying them valuable access to risk management tools that ultimately provide higher investment returns to pension funds and lower cost financing to state and local governments.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on May 03, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/04/26 19:57:59)