ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> JAABlog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Criminal Law

: JAABlog

CASES - Civil

By Jeffrey Ivashuk

ADVERTISEMENTS
Torts -- Medical malpractice -- Hospitals -- Negligent credentialing of physician -- Action for damages caused by neurosurgeon who performed posterior cervical surgery with rod insertion using Luque rods which were not suitable for use in cervical spine -- Evidence -- Expert -- Qualifications -- No abuse of discretion in permitting plaintiff's expert on credentialing to testify, although expert had no experience in hospital administration in Florida -- Florida hospitals are governed by the same accreditation standards used by hospitals all over the country, and witness had previously been accepted by other courts as an expert in credentialing cases in Florida as well as in other jurisdictions -- Expert's testimony that neurosurgeon had not been required to demonstrate proficiency in any of the procedures he performed, that neurosurgeon was not even eligible to request the privilege to perform the particular procedure at issue, that neurosurgeon was performing the procedure for the first time, and that hospital had, in effect, simply given neurosurgeon unrestricted privileges, in violation of its own regulations, together with testimony of expert neurosurgeon that any properly credentialed neurosurgeon would have known that rods used could not be used in cervical spine due to high probability that they would migrate into brain, was sufficient for jury to find that, but for negligent credentialing, neurosurgeon would not have been permitted to do the operation which caused plaintiff's injuries -- Damages -- Testimony by plaintiff's wife that plaintiff could no longer do household chores and yard work, unsupported by evidence as to the value of those services, was not sufficient to support amount awarded to wife for past and future lost services -- Attorney's fees -- Error to award attorney's fees under section 766...continue to full post

Full post as published by JAABlog on February 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/05/26 23:41:46)