Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> StandDown Texas Project
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: StandDown Texas ProjectCone v. Bell
By standdown
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Supreme Court has ruled in favor Gary Cone, a Tennessess death row inmate. Prosecutors had withheld information that should have been turned over to Cone's lawyers. The Court's opinion is here. The Scotus Wiki page for Cone v. Bell is here.SCOTUS Blog has this initial post.The Court has released the opinion in Cone v. Bell (07-1114). The decision below, which held for the state, is vacated and remanded in a 7-2 opinion by Justice Stevens available here.
The Chief Justice filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice
Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Scalia.AP has filed, "Court rules for Tenn. death row inmate," via Google News...continue to full postFull post as published by StandDown Texas Project on April 28, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Bell Canada
allegedly throttling internet speeds
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Owens v. Guida and Cone v. Bell:
Cone v. Bell highlights need for substance to trump procedure in death penalty cases
Oral Arguments in Cone v. Bell









