Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> StandDown Texas Project
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: StandDown Texas ProjectMagwood v. Patterson
By Steve Hall
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Supreme Court issued its ruling in Magwood v. Patterson this morning. The opinion is in Adobe .pdf format. The ScotusWiki file is here.SCOTUS Blog reports, "Court rules in favor of capital defendant in Magwood v. Patterson." It's written by Kevin Russell.Federal habeas law generally allows prisoners to bring a single habeas
petition; ?second and successive? petitions are highly disfavored and
must meet very strict criteria. This morning, the Court held in Magwood
v. Patterson (No. 09-158), that when a criminal defendant
succeeds in having his original sentence overturned, a later habeas
petition challenging his new sentence should be treated as a
first petition (not as a ?second or successive? petition), even if it
raises grounds that could have (but were not) made against the original
sentence...continue to full postFull post as published by StandDown Texas Project on June 24, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Podcasts: Magwood v. Patterson
Raising previously available claims in new death penalty habeas petitions
Court rules in favor of capital defendant in Magwood v. Patterson
What constitutes a “second or successive” petition in habeas challenges to death sentences
Argument transcript in Magwood v. Patterson
Opinion elaborating on "second or successive" habeas petition








