Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentPresence of others justified protective sweep
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Protective sweep was justified at the time of arrest beause of others potentially being present. United States v. Best, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84984 (M.D. Pa. October 22, 2008).*
Without an intervening change in the law, defendant cannot relitigate on post-conviction his search and seizure claim alreay denied by the court and affirmed on appeal. Dumas v. United States, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84772 (W.D. N.C. August 8, 2008).*
Forfeiture claimant sought to show he had an exclusionary rule claim as a defense to a forfeiture to show his excusable neglect. Here, the search was consented to, so he loses on that claim. United States v. One Piece of Real Property Located at 15010 S.W. 168th Street, Miami, FL, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84542 (S.D. Fla. March 6, 2008)...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on October 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CA1: sentencing, and car protective sweeps
Delancy: Consensual search not fruit of poisonous tree
FCC Adopts Protective Order In Matter of AT&T v. Cox
California immigration sweep nets 1157 arrests www.privateofficer.com
MO county arrests 44 in huge drug sweep









