Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Third Circuit Blog

Criminal Law

: Third Circuit Blog

Has the Third Circuit Ended Crack Litigation?

By Candace Hom, Melinda Ghilardi, Nancy Rimmer, Sarah Gannett, Renee Pietropaolo and Tieffa Harper

The decision in United States v. Doe, http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/083968p.pdf, holds that if the starting point for the sentence is not lowered by the retroactive crack amendment, a defendant is ineligible for relief under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2). This seems to put an end to litigation on behalf of career offenders who receive departure sentences, or those subject to mandatory minimum sentences who received 5K/3553(e) relief. The decision is based on what the panel calls the "second element" of section 3582(c)(2), which provides that reductions in sentence should be "consistent with" policy statements of the Sentencing Commission, and the Commission's policy statement in USSG section 1B1.10 that defendants are not entitled to relief unless the amendment has the effect of "lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range...continue to full post

Full post as published by Third Circuit Blog on May 01, 2009 (boomark / email).