Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyWowser again
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Sometimes I miss having a slower practice and the ability to dodge phone calls for a bit and do a post. The per curiam in Porter v. McCollum (08-10537), here, is one of those reasons.
The Court this term, through its per curiams, seems to be really emphasizing that a competent investigation, informed decision making, and reasonable trial strategy is required in order not to be found ineffective, Wong v. Bellemonte. Don’t do those three things and ineffectiveness is almost assured. Today’s case falls into the latter category. Counsel failed to adequately investigate his client’s military record and the horrors he had seen in the ugly face of war. The aftermath of war, as it does with so many soldiers, left him a broken man...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on November 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









