Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Estate Planning
: Toronto Estate Law BlogTaking "Gifts": The Very High Burden on Attorneys for Property to prove Gifts
By Hull & Hull LLP
Attorneys for property who receive gifts from grantors tomorrow will have to give them back, unless they have good evidence supporting the fact of the gift. The rule that fiduciaries (including attorneys for property) must prove purported gifts is stated in Cooke v. Lamotte(1851), 15 Beav. 234 at page 239.
Justice Sheard applied this rule in Kee v. Yip [1995] O.J. No. 2879, disallowing a series of transfers by an attorney to himself, stating with respect to one such transfer, 'The burden on Tom Kee to show that his mother gave him the $20,000 is a heavy one. His evidence, simply the assertion that this transaction, one of many that he did under power of attorney, was intended by her as a gift to him falls well short of discharging that burden of proof. Under the principle stated in Cooke v. Lamotte, supra, the $20,000 cannot be allowed as a gift and must be refunded."
Even more recently, in Volchuk v. Kotsis, 2007 CanLII 28527 (ON S.C.) Justice Langdon disallowed a series of purported gifts (cheques and money transfers) effected by an attorney, noting in addition that attorneys were precluded from relying solely on their own evidence by section 13 of the Ontario Evidence Act, which provides that the claimant 'shall not obtain a verdict, judgment or decision on his or her own evidence in respect of any matter occurring before the death of the deceased person, unless such evidence is corroborated by some other material evidence.'
In estates litigation, this rule is very useful in passings of accounts initiated pursuant to section 42 of the Sustitute Decisions Act by disappointed beneficiaries of an estate against the deceased's former attorney for property. Of course, this rule forms part of the Common Law and is not confined to passing of accounts proceedings.
Merry Christmas to fiduciaries including attorneys, and enjoy your presents.
Chris Graham
Christopher M.B. Graham - Click here for more information on Chris Graham.
Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on December 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
BMW Faces Class Action over High Pressure Fuel Pumps
BMW Faces Class Action over High Pressure Fuel Pumps
Majestic High Chairs
Recall Expanded
Envision High Chairs
Recalled by Evenflo
Air Pollution
Directly Linked to High Blood Pressure

Do charities (or charitable gifts) deserve special tax treatment
Class Gifts in the the New Restatement of Property
This week: Give yourself a gift
Specific Gifts and Drafting Flexibility
The Stevens Defense: Alaskan Claims that He Didnt Intend to Steal Car and Thus Is Innocent









