Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumThe voters have spoken. [edited]
[Just in case this post might be misunderstood, I've substantially edited it.]
In this semester's law of lawyering class at UC-Berkeley, I initially banned internet access but allowed them to vote mid-way through the semester on whether they wanted it back. The results:
Should internet usage be allowed in the classroom for the rest of the semester?
Yes - 34
No - 18
Have you paid more attention in this class than in others where internet is not overtly banned?
Yes, I've paid more attention. - 24
No, I've paid the same amount of attention. - 26
I don't use internet in any of my classes. - 3
In what way is classroom internet usage distracting for you?
I'm distracted by my own usage - 40
I'm distracted by others usage - 9
My attention never waivers - 11
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on March 12, 2009 (boomark / email).

Maybe the people have spoken on three-strikes
Journal of Legal Education to be Edited at Southwestern
Law Review Shenanigans, This Time from a Faculty-Edited Journal:
MO: Jefferson City voters overwhelmingly reject casinosagain
Handbook of Antitrust Economics








