Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeDefense verdict in Marshall patent case
By Michael Smith
I'm out of the office at the moment and will add details later, but a Marshall jury in Judge Everingham's court yesterday returned a defense verdict in Cooper Technologies v. Thomas & Betts Corp., 2:06cv242, finding one patent infringed but another not, but both patents were shown by clear and convincing evidence to be invalid on several (but not all asserted) grounds.
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on September 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Self Defense
It's legal to defend yourself and your family
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Marshall Astor
Over $1.35 million in property, art and jewelry returned in elder care abuse lawsuit.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
$1.5 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Verdict Against Fisher Controls International
$1.5 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Verdict
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
CIA
Department of Defense Sued by Veterans

A Defense Verdict in Marshall Believe It
SF Defense Verdict in Asbestos Case
$432 Million Verdict in Marshall Texas Patent Case
Court Upholds $21M Patent Infringement Verdict Against Nintendo









