Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportHillis v. Heineman (9th Cir. - Nov. 19, 2010)
By Shaun Martin
Not too long. Not too short. Not overly descriptive. Not overly normative. Correct holding. Concise, understandable and clear.
Just like filing a permissive counterclaim doesn't waive an otherwise-preserved objection to personal jurisdiction, ditto for venue (e.g., on the basis of a forum selection clause). A couple of older courts have perhaps held otherwise. But that's neither the majority, nor the correct, rule.
Wonderfully said here, Judge Gould.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on November 19, 2010 (boomark / email).

On Integrity and Performance: A Chat With Former GE GC Ben Heineman
Ben W. Heineman Jr. - Wired GC Seminar
Restoring Trust in Corporate Governance
Contra Heineman, do some CEOs mistrust high-powered law departments
Executive Compensation: What Obama’s Plan Means








