Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeThe "Hobson's Choice" Trilogy - Concerns About Litigation Costs Settlements Change Procedures in Multidefendant Patent Case
By Michael C. Smith
ADVERTISEMENTS
Parallel Networks v. Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, 6:10cv111 /
PACid v. Cisco, et al., 6:09cv324
Judge: Leonard Davis
Holdings: Actions consolidated; motion to sever and transfer denied as moot; plaintiff's motion to bifurcate liability and damages (no that's not a typo) denied; no more extensions of time absent good cause; "rifle shot" Markman hearing on defendants' three claimed case dispositive terms ordered.
No, this isn't a picture of Judge Davis. Althoug read more
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on March 18, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Patent litigation metrics and management techniques, but not costs
Adjusted for inflation, median damages in patent litigation have held steady for 12 years
Costs of Patent Infringement Litigation
Canadian patent cases cost millions less than US patent cases
Litigation management Part III -- intellectual property litigation costs









