Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeMultitasking in a patent case
By Michael C. Smith
Interesting order today in the LaserDynamics v. Quanta case getting ready to start trial in Judge Ward's court that may say something about bench briefs, or at least the division of labor at trial in patent cases. The court entered an order stating that Judge Everingham would hear argument on the issues raised in the parties? bench briefs downstairs while the parties are making opening statements upstairs.
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on June 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

Multitasking Switchtasking is Counterproductive
Forget Multitasking, You Need To Be Multi-Asking
"Guide: Anatomy of a Patent Case"
Multitasking - A Quintessential Juice Story







