ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: SCOTUSBLOG

Notable petitions

By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group

ADVERTISEMENTS

A recently filed petition, Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, challenges whether corporations have a right to privacy for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act.

An unrelated petition, Kentucky v. King, tests the constitutional boundaries of the requirement that police seek and receive a warrant before entering a residence.

Finally, Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County asks whether a federal court can confer a private right of action to enforce a federal contract because the statutory requirement sought to be enforced is part of a contract.  The contracts at issue in this case are between drug companies and certain public health care facilities.

Title: Kentucky v. King
Docket: 09-1272
Issues: (1) Under what circumstances can lawful police action impermissibly ”create” exigent circumstances that preclude warrantless entry; and (2) whether the “hot pursuit” exception to the warrant requirement applies only if the government can prove that the suspect was aware he was being pursued.

Title: Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County
Docket: 09-1273
Issue: Whether, in the absence of a private right of action to enforce a statute, federal courts have the federal common law authority to confer a private right of action simply because the statutory requirement sought to be enforced is embodied in a contract.

Title: Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.
Docket: 09-1279
Issue: Whether Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act — which exempts from mandatory disclosure records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes when such disclosure could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of “personal privacy” – protects the “privacy” of corporate entities.

Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on May 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0019 secs (from cache 11/06/26 03:22:31)