ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Barrister

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Barrister

Demographics and Demagogues

By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz

ADVERTISEMENTS

Anyone who reads this blog knows I am a big believer in government consolidation, particularly when it comes to public safety.   I have supported fire consolidation when Bart Peterson was Mayor of Indianapolis,  I support it now that Greg Ballard is Mayor and I will support it regardless of who the next mayor is.

What I think is ironic is that some of the people who were strong advocates of consolidating the Indianapolis Fire Department with the township fire departments have suddenly had concerns about “diversity” and the racial make up of the department.    Call me crazy, but in an inferno I have a hard time making out the race of the firefighter through the flames and thick smoke.

What critics say is that as IFD continues to consolidate it becomes less diverse because there are fewer minority firefighters in the townships.  They argue that the percentage of minority firefighters should reflect the numbers in the city which is about 20-25%.  The problem with playing the numbers game is that it’s a double-edged sword.

For example IFD, post Lawrence Township merger, is 84% white and 14% black.  That number may seem small, however, when you look at the command structure, I could argue blacks are over-represented.  50% of the assistant chiefs are black.  66% of the division chiefs are black.  42% of IFD’s captains are black.  And 40% of the lieutenants are black.    So while critics argue consolidation dilutes minority representation on the fire department, they say nothing about how minorities are “overrepresented” in IFD’s command structure.

Of course this is a ridiculous statement to make, but that’s the problem when you start playing a pure numbers game; you go from the sublime to the ridiculous.   The city should strive for diversity in its ranks, but when all you look at is numbers, you’re asking for trouble.

Speaking of numbers,  blacks make up 27% of the City-County Council and 53% of the Democratic caucus.   If we’re going to play the numbers game it’s clear to see they are over-represented on the Council as well as the caucus.  So who should give up their seat so we have proportionate representation?  Where should I begin?

Full post as published by Indiana Barrister on October 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/03/26 06:30:44)