ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> The Trade Secrets Vault

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: The Trade Secrets Vault

Injunction denied in insulin meter trade secrets case

ADVERTISEMENTS
Ropes & Gray LLP Bradford Badke, Sona De, Matt Traupman, Moriah Agovino, and Julie Cadatal Ropes & Gray team has obtained a victory for client Nova Biomedical Corporation in a suit brought by rival Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition and several other related claims. In the suit, Medtronic Minimed, Inc. v. Nova Biomedical Corporation et al, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that Medtronic had failed to show it would be irreparably harmed and that it had not established that it was likely to succeed on the merits. Medtronic sued Nova to stop the company's effort to manufacture and market its Nova Max Link blood glucose meter. The Nova Max Link meter has the ability to wirelessly communicate a patient's blood glucose level to a Medtronic insulin pump, which then recommends an insulin dosage to the patient. Medtronic alleged that the Nova Max Link meter utilizes trade secrets contained in Medtronic's "Communication Technology." Nova denies that it uses any Medtronic trade secret and asserts that Medtronic voluntarily disclosed its "Communication Technology" to Nova as part of an earlier joint development effort. On March 18, 2008, Medtronic filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against Nova based on its misappropriation of trade secrets claim under California's Uniform Trade Secret Act. But on May 16, 2008, the court denied Medtronic's request and ruled that Medtronic had raised only speculative injuries and that should it ultimately prevail, Medtronic could recover money damages. The court went on to find that Medtronic had not shown that it made reasonable efforts to protect its Communication Technology secret, noting that "[a]s of December 2007, Nova was free to disclose the Communication Technology to the world." Finally, the Court found that because the Nova Max Link meter is the only meter of its kind currently on the market, permitting our client to distribute their meter serves the public interest.

Full post as published by The Trade Secrets Vault on June 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/02/26 00:40:27)