Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: Kentucky CasesADMINISTRATIVE/REGULATORY LAW: Commonwealth, Energy and Environmental Cabinet v. Spurlock (COA 1/22/2010)
By Michael Stevens
2008-CA-001184 01/22/2010 2010 WL 199411
Opinion by Judge Thompson; Judges Caperton and Wine concurred. The Court reversed and remanded orders of the circuit court declaring that the Energy and Environmental Cabinet?s final orders entered against appellee, based on his failure to respond to the Cabinet?s orders, were void. The Court first held that the trial court properly utilized a de novo standard of review. However, the Court then held that Commonwealth of Kentucky, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet v. Kentec Coal Co., Inc., 177 S.W.3d 718 (Ky. 2005), was distinguishable on its facts. Because the notice provided by the Cabinet incorrectly advised appellee that he was not entitled to an administrative hearing absent prepayment of penalties, appellee was entitled to request a formal hearing accompanied by a proper request for a waiver from the prepayment provisions.
Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on March 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
FRS Healthy Energy
alleging the quercetin benefits from FRS energy products are a scam.
Gothic Cabinet Bunk Beds
Recalled due to Fall Hazard
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
401K / ERISA Stock Fraud
Hardcore Energy Drinks
FDA, Health Canada Warn of Suspected Tampering

Blawg of the Day - Environmental & Energy Law Monitor
Blawg of the Day - Environmental, Energy and Resources Law
Open Door and the Judicial Cabinet's Legal Expenses
Alternative Energy v. Wilderness Preservation:








